I envy how well you presented your theory of life / existence! It was thrilling reading! --and embarrassing, given how I've been struggling to work out congruent ideas. I was 100% on board (big fan of the Chinese Room) until you got to the idea of God.

Speaking as an fellow ex-Catholic (and former altar boy) it's clear that if God exists, God is beyond human comprehension. Specifically, God wouldn't perceive or conceive; God wouldn't understand or find any meaning in anything. As you say, these functions you cite are only functions of beings needing to adapt. They would be absent, superfluous, out of place in a being that does not have to adapt. What would be present? I have no idea, because I can only think about adapting.

However, I understand Spinoza gave this some serious thought, which is widely admired, basically equating God with the Cosmos.

Also, the late brilliant philosopher Michael Dummett (who was a devout Catholic) at the end of his book The Logical Basis of Metaphysics talks about a human asking God a true-or-false question and God not answering because true-or-false is a human thing that humans cannot transcend, and God's thing, whatever it is, would be without meaning to a human stuck in true-or-false modality.