I learned a lot reading Parts 1&2. I'm particularly grateful to finally understand Bergson; he has been poorly explained by other authors.

I'm not a fan of, and disagree with, scientism. Reading your pieces though got me wondering how much of the critiques of scientism is a critique of scientists? I don't think of science itself endorsing patriarchy; rather it's arrogant scientists being patriarchal. Is there merit in teasing out the differences in beliefs/values between science and scientism and (some) scientists?